
In most businesses and organizations, the pressure to grow comes from everywhere: from investors, boards, market expectations, and an implicit logic that bigger means more legitimate. A team of 10 looks scrappy, while a team of 500 is serious. Scale, especially unchallenged scale, becomes a proxy for impact. And when organizations scale, what’s rarely examined is how those decisions reshape who holds power, and whether the work still belongs to the people it was built to serve.
What we've seen, again and again, is that growth without purpose makes democratic workplaces dramatically less self-governing. Power that was once carefully distributed is gradually re-centralized.
Research on cooperative economies helps explain this. A 2025 study in the Basque Country found that when democratic organizations grow conventionally, they tend to undergo what it calls “degeneration,” a gradual weakening of cooperative principles.
But there are examples where growth doesn’t lead to degeneration. The study examined Agintzari, a nonprofit that expanded its impact through inter-cooperative networks. These networks let organizations coordinate with peer cooperatives, operating outside traditional corporate models. Agintzari’s impact spread through the network instead of through the organization’s size.
A similar pattern appears in the work of Cooperation Jackson, a solidarity economy ecosystem in Jackson, Mississippi, built around interlinked cooperatives and community institutions. Cooperation Jackson scales capacity across connected enterprises, so as reach increases, decision-making stays distributed across the community it serves.
In both cases, it's the organizational model (not company size) that determines whether power remains distributed.
This dynamic extends far beyond cooperatives and into how leaders make decisions about growth every day. Ninety-six percent of executives say a well-functioning democracy matters to a strong economy, and yet most weren't sure what role they could play in pushing back against global authoritarianism. Leaders have an important role to play inside their organizations—every time they decide how their organization expands and who holds power in that process, they have the opportunity to contribute to a democratic economy.
For pro-democracy organizations, scaling with integrity means paying close attention to how power gets distributed as everything grows. If revenue scales, governance has to scale with it. If headcount doubles, the infrastructure for shared decision-making should expand, too. It's easy to build the topline; it's harder to advance democratic practices alongside that growth. But our research suggests the payoff is immense; breakout innovation stays possible at scale when the shared power underpinning it isn’t left behind.
So we return to the questions Jess raised at Mozilla Festival late last year: Growth for whom? To what end? Measured by what? Accountable to whom? These are the beginnings of intentional scale and the questions brave leaders are asking right now.
In solidarity,
Jess Rimington & Joanna Levitt Cea

A Beloved Tip: Seek Difference
Organizations often hire for diversity and then assume the work is done. Too often, the room may look different, or the lived experience present may have expanded, but decision-making and influence remain the same. And new team members are just expected to conform to the existing norms and culture.
Beloved Economies’ research finds that diverse perspectives only generate breakout thinking for an enterprise when all team members feel inspired and able to share the insights they hold. This is critical to what we call deconsolidating rights to design, which expands who shapes decisions and how they are made.
Deconsolidating those rights can look like many things, including:
Using diagonal slices of participation. Innovation Engineering, an organization we profiled in the Beloved Economies book, models this well: Effective groups intentionally bring together people across roles and functions so no single perspective defines the problem or the solution.
Actively seeking skeptics, because dissent is critical information and often provides critiques that sharpen solutions. As Russ Gaskin of CoCreative, another Beloved Economies co-learner, has found, skeptics who come to trust a process transform into its most powerful advocates.
Both practices work best when organizations create multiple ways for people to contribute, like working in pairs before full groups or individual reflection before open discussion, so the loudest voices don't dominate. Beloved Tip: Before your next convening, ask the question co-learner Aisha Shillingford recommends building into regular practice: Who is impacted by this work, or has a perspective on it, that isn't present at this table? Then ask a second question: Once they're there, will the conditions let them lead?

What We're Reading
Kimberlé Crenshaw Says Juneteenth Reminds Us "Freedom Is Not a One and Done Situation." In conversation about her new memoir, Crenshaw reflects on what it means to keep fighting for rights that feel newly precarious, and why understanding history as an ongoing process is what this political moment demands. Mother Jones. (10 minutes)
For Hope to Inspire, It Has to Be Grounded in Organizational Reality. Hope is goal-directed, and leaders who treat it as simple optimism tend to promise futures no one believes in. The most effective visions pair genuine ambition with honest accounts of constraints so people see a believable path forward. Harvard Business Review. (8 minutes)
Reflections on "Third Wave" Philanthropy and a New Generation of Tech Wealth. Tens of billions in new philanthropic dollars are about to flow from AI company IPOs, and the organizations that will attract them look nothing like the ones doing the slow, unglamorous work of shifting systems. FWIW. (9 minutes)
This Restaurant Stopped Charging for Food. And Profits Are Up. Dylan Alverson, a Minneapolis café owner, frustrated by a local ICE enforcement operation and a restaurant industry where nearly 50% of owners aren't profitable, removed prices and went donation-only. Revenue went up, not down. Sound familiar? We profiled him in our Pro-Democracy Business series in February here. In June, The New York Times profiled Alverson. New York Times. (10 minutes)
Viral Campaigns to Community-buy Spirit Airlines and Hampshire College Sparked Widespread Interest in Cooperative Ownership. This quick LinkedIn post maps the governance and legal ecosystem behind the model. New Economy Coalition. (2 minutes)

Quick Bite


An Offering

Building a Beloved Economy requires more than just vision or good intentions. You need tangible skills to lead, strategize, and stay grounded when everything feels hard.
That's why we're excited about the Next Economy MBA from LIFT Economy. It's made for people who are trying to build a more just, regenerative economy.
Over nine months, you'll gain practical skills, a peer community, and strategic clarity to transform organizations, launch a new venture, or influence change from within. LIFT has been doing this work for eight years now, with 850+ people having gone through the program.
Registration opens September 29th for their 17th cohort, and the Beloved Economies community gets 10% off. It stacks with early bird and BIPOC equity pricing, too. Apply the code BELOVEDMB@ during the checkout process to unlock the discount.
We'd love for you to consider the program. Learn more about the Next Economy MBA here.


